How National Geographic Drives Giant Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram EngagementLucy HitzBlogger ExtraordinaireSimply Measured
Social media analytics company Shareablee ranked National Geographic as the most effective publisher in the social space for the month of July, with 46.4 million engagements on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Today, National Geographic has an audience that’s 40 million-strong between Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
The Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit owes its social success to a cohesive cross-network strategy designed to lead people directly to its website. Any media company or nonprofit can learn from what this legacy brand — the National Geographic Society has been inspiring people to care about the planet since 1888 — is doing to make its brand and mission relevant in the contemporary social sphere.
I looked at a two-week time period, August 25 – September 8, in an effort to find out what National Geographic does in an average posting cycle, and how its strategies differ depending on the network. Here’s what I found.
@NatGeo has 7.24 million followers on Twitter. Their Twitter profile describes National Geographic like this: “Since 1888, we’ve traveled the Earth, sharing its amazing stories with new generations.” Despite being a revered, reliable source, the brand is anything but musty and old-fashioned.
Less than 5% of National Geographic’s 206 Tweets were photos.
While National Geographic led with photos on Facebook and Instagram (more on that later), most of their Tweets — 194 out of 206, to be exact — were links back to content on nationalgeographic.com.
Clearly, National Geographic’s current Twitter strategy is focused pointing people back to their site as much as possible. They don’t want to give away their gorgeous, high-quality visual content — they prefer to have folks explore their content at NationalGeographic.com.
But when National Geographic does post photos on Twitter, they see serious engagement.
Seven out of 10 of National Geographic’s top posts on Twitter during this time period were photos — and National Geographic only tweeted 10 photos during that timeframe. This means that, when National Geographic does offer up the photographic journalism they’re known for directly to social, they hit the mark just right.
Rich content doesn’t necessarily equal high engagement.
National Geographic’s weekly Friday Facts posts do well. They see surprisingly strong engagement for including no photo content, no video content — not even a link back to the National Geographic site. The learning here is twofold. Because National Geographic is a known, respected news source, they have the public’s trust. This makes a factoid post like the one above uber successful, while a greener brand with a less solid reputation might not see the same response.
The second lesson here is that a brand Tweet doesn’t need a lot of glitz and glam to be successful. It just needs to offer some new and surprising value to followers.
National Geographic has 30.9 million fans on Facebook. During my two-week sample time period, they posted roughly half (57%) the amount that they posted on Twitter — but retained over four times the audience. Similar to its activity on Twitter, National Geographic used Facebook almost entirely for links. They drove the most engagement from photos, but only posted four pictures out of the 117 posts during this time period.
100% of link posts feature images or video integration.
This gave National Geographic the high engagement levels of a photo or video post, while also driving traffic to their website. It’s a 1-2 punch, and a powerful posting strategy for any media company looking to drive site traffic while simultaneously seeing in-network engagement.
On Twitter, National Geographic’s strategy is posting few images and videos, while on Facebook most links have image or videos. This tells us that National Geographic sees Twitter as less of a visual network and more of a place to attract folks with informational tidbits and news items, while it sees Facebook as a more “magazine-like” network with which to give users a feel and preview for what their website offers.
@natgeo has 7.1 million followers on Instagram. Instagram was home to National Geographic’s most engaging post on any network during this time period, passing their second-most engaging post by 40,000 Likes in just one day: That’s because this is the perfect Instagram post. It is visually stunning and incredibly well-photographed (a.k.a. staying true to the National Geographic brand).
It displays a dramatic interaction between a human being and her natural environment (a.k.a. staying true to the National Geographic brand). It tags the photographer, the reporter, the photo subject, and itself for optimal discovery purposes. And most noteably, it describes what is happening in an unusual scene, making the post a mini magazine story
There’s a lot to be learned from National Geographic’s Instagram strategy, number one being: To thine own self be true (but don’t be afraid to update thyself for the ‘Gram, either).
NatGeo started experimenting with Hyperlapse early.
@natgeo posted five Hyperlapse-tagged posts. These saw a healthy average of 110,139 engagements. This post saw the most engagement: Bottom line: everyone loves buffalo. Just kidding.
What I’d like to highlight here is that National Geographic isn’t afraid to experiment with new apps and ways of looking at the natural beauty which sits at the heart of their brand, while also placing value on ecological learning, no matter the social medium.
What Can You Learn From National Geographic’s Social Strategies?
Where do you think National Geographic’s strategies are the strongest, regardless of follower count or engagement numbers?
I’m the Content Marketing Manager here at Simply Measured. I manage our blog, produce longform content, head our co-marketing initiatives, and host the Simply Social podcast, among a few other things. I love yoga, The X-Files, peaty scotch, hiking, and poetry. If I were a social media channel, I’d want to be Instagram, but I think I’m Twitter.
The Top 10 Retail Brands on Instagram, Twitter, and FacebookLucy HitzBlogger ExtraordinaireSimply Measured
There’s a lot to be learned from looking at the top-performing brands in the social game network-by-network. Retail brands are devoting time and money to their presences on these major social networks at an ever-increasing rate. But who’s winning? When I say winning, I mean, who’s seeing their audience grow and engage? What are these brands… Continue Reading
#ThisIsHardRock: How a Hashtag Can Connect A Global Brand’s ProfilesLucy HitzBlogger ExtraordinaireSimply Measured
How can brands with multiple handles focus their efforts? Hard Rock Cafe’s answer to this question comes in the form of a hashtag. #ThisIsHardRock is employed across all their brand handles. Guests are encouraged to employ it, as well. It’s a tactic that’s been successful at both crowdsourcing guest experience and managing over 20 global properties — in other… Continue Reading
How the Travel Channel Wins by Catering Content to Google+, Instagram, and BeyondLucy HitzBlogger ExtraordinaireSimply Measured
According to recent research, the average Travel Channel viewer: Takes four domestic vacations each year (one more than the average non-viewer). Spends approximately $2,625 on a typical domestic vacation or leisure trip (38% more than the average non-viewer). Lists sightseeing and heading to the beach as their most popular vacation activities. Even more notably, the research found… Continue Reading
How Applebee’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Chili’s, and More Connect with Customers on FacebookLucy HitzBlogger ExtraordinaireSimply Measured
How do popular sit-down restaurants like Applebee’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Chili’s, Olive Garden, and The Cheesecake Factory create and enliven their Facebook fan communities? I looked at their most commented-on posts between November 24th, 2013 – November 24, 2014 to find out. It turns out that asking good questions, replying often, and sometimes offering rewards for participation gives these… Continue Reading